Connect existing programs
Calendar, billing and customer list exchange data automatically. You enter once, it appears everywhere. No new program to learn.
It is twelve kilometres from Rottenburg to Tübingen. Close enough to look at your processes on site instead of having them described to me over the phone.
Tübingen is a university town and a hospital location. That shapes who runs businesses here: alongside classic trades and hospitality there are many medical practices, therapists, law firms, agencies and service providers with five to thirty employees.
These businesses have a different problem than a trades business out in the district. They are usually not paper-based — they tend to have too many programs. A calendar system here, a billing tool there, an Excel list in between, and somebody transfers entries by hand.
In cases like that my recommendation is often: do not buy anything new. Instead connect the tools you already have so the manual transfer disappears. That is cheaper, faster, and your people do not have to learn anything new.
Less paper than in the surrounding area, but more breaks between systems. Time is lost where one program ends and the next begins.
All three build on what you already have. A complete system change is the exception, not the rule.
Calendar, billing and customer list exchange data automatically. You enter once, it appears everywhere. No new program to learn.
Customers book and cancel online, the waiting list moves up automatically, reminders go out by themselves. The phone gets considerably quieter.
Recurring enquiries get a ready-made draft reply. You read it, correct if needed, send. Five minutes become twenty seconds.
I do not sell licences and I get no commission from software vendors. If the best solution for you is an off-the-shelf product for thirty euros a month, I will tell you — even though I earn nothing from it.
I also do not build anything you could not run without me. What gets built belongs to you: data, access, documentation. A working relationship should last because it works, not because leaving would be too expensive.
And I do not use AI because it happens to sound good. In most places simpler technology is more reliable and cheaper. AI comes in where it makes a measurable difference — reading documents, for example, or preparing replies.
Yes. An above-average amount of time goes into appointment management and callbacks there, and that is exactly what automates well. Patient data comes with additional requirements though — we clarify those specifically beforehand, not in general terms.
No. In most cases the existing software stays and gets connected. The effort is considerably smaller than a switch, and your people do not have to learn anything new.
A first usable version usually exists within days. Getting it running cleanly in everyday use takes a few weeks depending on scope. After the analysis I give you a concrete timeframe, not a vague range.
As little as possible. Anything that needs training does not get used in everyday work. I would rather build it so it explains itself — and show the rest in one session on site.
Yes, at no extra cost. If you prefer the phone, that works just as well. For the actual analysis, though, an on-site appointment is far more informative.
More answers on the FAQ page.
30 minutes, free, no strings attached. Afterwards you know whether it is worth it — and if it is not, I say so.