Appointments that manage themselves
Booking, rescheduling and cancelling happen online. The waiting list moves up automatically, reminders go out by themselves. The phone gets noticeably quieter.
In care services and medical practices a considerable part of the day goes into coordination: appointments, cancellations, routes, documentation, callbacks. Part of that can be handed off.
When I talk to care services and practices, it is almost never about the actual work with people. It is about everything around it: the route that has to be replanned in the morning because somebody is ill. The cancellation at seven that nobody notices. The documentation caught up on in the evening. The phone that does not stop.
That is not a minor matter. If a qualified professional spends an hour a day on coordination, that is around 220 hours over a year — in exactly the staff group that is hardest to find.
At the same time this is the most sensitive area I work in. It involves health data, and that is specially protected. So I make no blanket promises here but clarify the specific case before anything gets built.
The points that come up most often.
Not the care, not the treatment, not the professional judgement. The coordination around it.
Booking, rescheduling and cancelling happen online. The waiting list moves up automatically, reminders go out by themselves. The phone gets noticeably quieter.
The system proposes an order that accounts for travel times and qualifications. You decide — but you do not start from scratch.
Capture while it happens instead of from memory in the evening. Few taps, prepared building blocks, no free-text essay.
Health data is specially protected under Art. 9 GDPR, and in medical practices professional confidentiality under § 203 of the German Criminal Code applies on top. That is not a formality to be handled afterwards — it determines how a system may be built in the first place.
What I do promise: hosting in the EU, access only for the people who need it professionally, a data processing agreement under Art. 28 GDPR, and that you can get at your data at any time.
What I do not promise: that every idea in this sector can be implemented. Some things are legally difficult or disproportionately expensive. If that applies to your plan, I say so in the first call — and not after you have signed a quote.
For practices there is an additional rule: anything touching the practice management system gets clarified in advance with you and the respective vendor. I take no shortcuts there.
That depends on the specific setup and it is the first question we clarify — before any quote. A lot can be built so that no health data is processed at all, for example pure appointment coordination. Where it is, Art. 9 GDPR applies and, in practices, professional confidentiality on top.
No. A PMS is certified and deeply embedded in billing processes — I do not touch it. What usually makes sense is an addition at the points the PMS does not cover, such as appointment coordination or recurring enquiries.
No, and that would be the wrong goal. Whoever wants to call still calls. The point is that those who prefer to book online can do so — freeing up the phone for the people who need it.
The first call and the analysis are free. After that you get a quote with a fixed scope. If the effort does not pay off in your case, I say so clearly after the analysis.
The changeover happens step by step and in parallel with the existing process, not as a hard cut-over date. Only once a part runs reliably does the old route get switched off.
More answers on the FAQ page.
30 minutes, free, no strings attached. Afterwards you know whether it is worth it — and if it is not, I say so.